9 Comments
Sep 6·edited Sep 6Liked by Aditya Grover

What beautiful research! And the way it has been articulated is impeccable! Superb stuff! Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment
author

thanks for your feedback!

Expand full comment
Sep 2Liked by Aditya Grover

Fascinating article! Thanks for writing.

Expand full comment
author

thankyou for reading!

Expand full comment

Enjoyed reading! Just one point wanted to clarify. With suppliest

to revenues to dark stores being accounted as revenues to hyperpure doesn't , It's a related party transaction with opportunity to overstate the income? Is it like hyperpure sells to blinkit or hyperpure sells to sellers on blinkit who supply the goods to blinkit to keep in dark stores?

Expand full comment
author

thanks! Since Hyperpure business is a b2b model and majority of Blinkit's darkstores are actually not Blinkit owned - we there is a think 3rd party involved here who manages/ own/ runs the darkstore's inventory and hence Hyperpure records that sales as final revenue (which doesn't get net off as interparty later).

For reference, do read Akshant Goyal's response in August 2023 Concall (Q1 FY24)

Expand full comment

Awesome stuff. 👌

Expand full comment

Thankyou for the write up . I never knew abt Hyperpure .

Expand full comment
author

Yes, the leadership rarely talks about Hyperpure - and the social handles of Hyperpure just mentions supplying to restaurants, might be a deliberate attempt to keep it undercover and quickly build a robust supply chain.

Expand full comment